Beastars is Tokyo Ghoul done right

The stop-motion opening song is great. Even if you can’t yet watch the whole series on Netflix, at least go watch that on Youtube.

Once-upon-a-time, I watched the anime Tokyo Ghoul on the recommendation of a gaggle of nerdy middle schoolers. I didn’t really like it. But, for my students, maybe I could enjoy their enjoyment of the show even if I regret lying to them that I did like it to win some “cool teacher points.” It was, at least, something to talk about.

Now though, with the conclusion of the fall 2019 anime Beastars, about a high school for anthropomorphized animals struggling through a conflict between herbivores and carnivores that results in the murder of an alpaca, I finally have something good to suggest to my students in Tokyo Ghoul‘s place — because Beastars does everything that Tokyo Ghoul tried to do, just better, from themes about discrimination and growing up to its general production quality (even despite Beastar’s sometimes awkward 3D animation).

First then, I suppose I should briefly re-explain my distaste for Tokyo Ghoul before moving on to my recommendation for Beastars itself:

~ because it’s not like anybody’ll click that over-sized link above!

Tokyo Ghoul disgusted me not for its depiction of quasi-cannibalism but for the basic setting that established the need for that cannibalism to occur in the first place. The premise locks humans and “ghouls” into an ecological conflict by which ghouls prey on humans for food. In response, the human police forces hunt down and murder would-be ghoul predators, thus causing a spiraling cycle of violence that degenerates beyond self-defense into street executions, terrorism, blood sports, torture, and whatever other audience-titillating gorefests I’ve since forgotten. But despite the lead protagonist Kaneki’s unique position as a half-ghoul-ish and his privileged membership among a group of non-violent ghouls that feed on suicide-corpses, Tokyo Ghoul’s premise precludes a clean resolution. After all, the ghouls need to eat but, to do so, a human will always have to die…

With that setup then, I think that interpretations of the series that take it as some kind of allegory against racial discrimination miss that the zero-sum, predator-prey premise underneath the allegory resembles the intellectual foundation of some of history’s most virulent racists*. Imagine if minority groups didn’t just want human rights, they wanted to eat your family! Or don’t, because that’s gross and the reason why I can’t appreciate Tokyo Ghoul’s thematic content no matter how enthusiastic my students were for Kaneki’s tale of youthful rebellion.

* [for example, the white-nationalist “bible” The Turner Diaries includes a scene in which black people eat white children!!!]

By contrast, Beastars lacks the same sort of ecological essentialism despite a similar predatory divide between herbivores and carnivores. Instead, it takes an approach maybe more like social constructionism than some kind of naïve absolutist ‘realism’ – though carnivores do attack herbivores on occasion, most animals get along with their neighbors by adopting semi-vegetarian diets (which include eggs… yuck). The greatest trouble comes from social systems that enable commercialized predation by Yakuza-like criminal syndicates buoyed by the tacit complicity of timid politicians. Or in other words, despite the more or less real instincts that drive the series’ animal drama, unlike in Tokyo Ghoul, the conflict in Beastars has a plausible resolution if the characters involved would only choose to act better. The ambitious deer Louis dreams of ending the live-meat trade and the gentle wolf Legosi struggles to overcome his predatory instincts for his crush, the white rabbit Haru (who suffers from her own self-destructive impulses). Contrasting side stories like a tiger’s use of illegal blood for ‘doping’ or a group of carnivore high-schoolers’ first visit to a meat market establish the ways that early social experiences construct and reinforce the inter-group tensions between herbivores and carnivores. Ironically then, even bound by instinct, Beastars makes for a much more effective and realistic basis for an examination of human vice than Tokyo Ghoul‘s dark grit and gore.

And then Beastars does better again by layering that setting-level conflict with more nuanced character portraits. For example, the most compelling of them considers how Legosi’s resistance to his assigned social role as a powerful carnivore doubles up with a gender conflict in which his quiet personality clashes with expectations of his virility as a wolf. Against his herbivore best-friend in Louis and his would-be lover in the she-wolf Juno, who both cultivate extreme, self-conscious auras of masculinity and femininity respectively, Legosi struggles to find comfort in his own awkward body (again, mirrored by conflicts in his actual-lover Haru, though she receives less point-of-view screen time than Legosi). Pushed into the real world, the series perhaps leans into themes emphasizing the acceptance of different gender expressions which, again, puts Beastars so far ahead of Tokyo Ghoul with its bizarre, stereotyped depictions of gay men. On other issues explored through the herbivore/carnivore dynamic, like a sympathetic contrast between ambition and modesty or natural talent versus hard-work, Beastars achieves similar thematic depth.

I’ll hold off on any more rigorous thoughts for now because it’s the New Year holiday and I’m lazy. And oh, I might even have a good excuse to stop here too: though this first season ends with an acceptable resolution, the last episode already promises a season two on the way. Plus, English audiences have to wait until nex– this year for it to appear on Netflix anyway (and shhh… Netflix maybe-kinda thinks I’m still in Japan).

So, I’ll stop here with a solid recommend for anyone waiting to watch it because of region-locking. And, if you still might prefer Tokyo Ghoul for its adolescent nonsense (I can relate), I can promise that Beastars has plenty of violence and romance to keep it in good competition even on that front — and in much better humor too.

~ yay ~

4 thoughts on “Beastars is Tokyo Ghoul done right

  1. Great post!! I was one of those edgy Tokyo Ghoul kids back in the day, so its similarities with Beastars really stuck out to me. It’s undeniable that Beastars beats Tokyo Ghoul in almost every way. Although, you shouldn’t discount TG’s appeal as a shounen-esque battle anime with consistent fight scenes, power-ups, flashy abilities, etc. I believe that’s why a lot of people will still enjoy it more than Beastars.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh yeah, I totally agree about the action — I hoped maybe that my first and last paragraphs show that I don’t discount that. It’s why my students loved it, at least. And, like I’ve said many times before on this site, I enjoy some good adolescent nonsense. Buuut… eh, Tokyo Ghoul was just too gross for me to stomach.

      Like

  2. The Black Market in Beastars is a little more complicated than just commercialized predation realized by underworld gangs and permitted by timid politicians, though they are important aspects to it. It’s allowed to exist because it’s seen as a necessary evil much like like Edo period Yoshiwara — a cathartic steam valve for carnivores who might otherwise blow their top and kill something if they abstain from meat for too long. As it’s alluded to in the anime (and pointed out more in the manga), patrons of the Black Market’s wares not only include your generic carnivorous adult lowlifes, but also otherwise respectable adult carnivore citizens.

    I’m actually in the middle of writing a piece about Beastars and Zootopia, and how Beastars is different from Zootopia because of the former’s depictions of struggle with ecological essentialism. What Beastars does have going for it despite this compared to Tokyo Ghoul though (which didn’t occur to me before because I didn’t watch Tokyo Ghoul) is that the former is not gratuitous with its violence, gore, and cannibalism.

    Also, I can also totally identify with your experience and frustration with fake enjoying an anime to make your kids like you more. I’ve been doing the same thing for my kids now with Kimetsu no Yaiba/Demon Slayer.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh, that’s great on the meat market. I haven’t seen Zootopia so I can’t comment there, but just to elaborate a litttttle bit more on the essentialism angle: even though Beastars relies on biological essentialism for its drama (the struggle with instinct), unlike Tokyo Ghoul, I think it does an important job challenging it through Louis and Legosi especially. I held off on writing more about it because, who knows, maybe the theme will fall off a barbaric cliff in season two (plus, my lazzzy holiday), but I think the series is tacking towards the possibility of overcoming those instincts. It’s not all Hobbesian yet!

      And haha on the gratuity in Tokyo Ghoul, though like the other commenter said, I think the violence is maybe the point for the kids, even if I can hardly stand it myself.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s